KYC and AML Compliance: Key Differences and Best Practices

By
Tarun Nazare
23 Oct
5 Mins

If the Indian economy has taught us one thing, it’s that Know Your Customer (KYC) alone isn’t enough to prevent financial scams. Illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing are quite notorious in the banking and corporate sectors, which indicates a growing need to find a holistic way to prevent such activities.

Enter Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, the answer to combating financial crimes. While KYC effectively verifies customers' identities and filters out bad players, a recent study showed that 70% of frauds have occurred even after completing KYC processes. This is where AML strengthens the KYC process and deters criminals even further. 

While both concepts are similar in objective, they have underlying differences. Let’s explore how KYC differs from AML and some of their best practices in fintech!

What is Know Your Customer (KYC)?

Know Your Customer refers to the mandatory process of verifying customers' identities. Organisations and financial institutions collect information about their customers in compliance with legal requirements for identity verification and risk assessment. As a critical component of anti-money laundering, KYC is primarily used to prevent financial crimes like fraud, identity theft, etc.

What is Anti-Money Laundering (AML)?

Anti-money laundering refers to the regulations and procedures organisations and financial institutions follow to detect and prevent financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorism. It involves performing extensive due diligence on customers, monitoring their transactions for suspicious activities, and reporting them if a crime is suspected. AML compliance is usually carried out to prevent illegal activities such as tax evasion, political corruption, money laundering, terrorist financing, etc. 

What is the Difference Between KYC and AML?

Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering are legal requirements for businesses to protect against financial crimes. However, they differ in the following ways:

Know Your Customer Anti-Money Laundering
Purpose To verify customer identities and monitor financial behaviour. To detect and prevent money laundering or terrorist financing activities.
Process Involves collecting and verifying customer information such as their name, address, date of birth, documents, etc. Involves risk assessment, reporting, and legal controls over suspicious activities and transactions.
Risk Management Identifying and assessing risks. Mitigating risks associated with money laundering.
Approach Comprehensive, continuous, and follows a risk-based approach. Proactively measures all AML risks and implements holistic policies to reduce them.

Where and When are KYC and AML Required?

To prevent financial crimes, KYC and AML are required in various industries and circumstances. Following both are mandatory for all regulated entities, some of which include:

  • Financial institutions: Before onboarding new customers, assess risks and detect suspicious activity. 
  • Payment service providers: KYC and AML are done before opening digital wallets or activating digital transactions.
  • Cryptocurrency exchanges: Crypto and DeFi platforms implement KYC and AML before allowing users to trade or convert digital assets to prevent money laundering via cryptocurrencies.
  • Gambling and casinos: They are done upon player registration, during large transactions, and withdrawal of funds. 
  • Corporate entities: Large corporations and venture capital firms conduct KYC and AML checks during mergers, acquisitions, or major investments to ensure legitimacy and prevent illicit financial activities. 

What Does the AML Screening Process Look Like?

Organisations and financial institutions typically perform AML screening. They check potential customers against public lists to verify whether they are high-risk individuals or are involved with entities engaging in money laundering or terrorist financing. In other words, they analyse customer information and transactions to verify their legitimacy and identify suspicious behaviours. 

While conducting an AML screening process, you should be on the lookout for a few red flags like usual transactions, use of anonymous entities, unexplained wealth increase, large cash transactions, etc.

There are a few types of screening processes your business can conduct:

  • Sanctions screening: These lists are maintained by government agencies and contain information about individuals or entities deemed national security threats. These are individuals who are prohibited from certain financial dealings.
  • Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) Checks: Under this process, individuals who hold high-profile positions in government or politics may be more likely to engage in financial crimes such as bribery or corruption, making them high-risk individuals.
  • Adverse media sources: These sources include negative news stories that may be associated with the customer being verified. This check ensures that the individual does not portray the company negatively. 
  • Watchlist Screening: Companies check a customer’s information against specific databases containing data about known or suspected criminals. Watchlists are similar to sanction lists but are constantly updated and even employ real-time screening for adequate due diligence.

How does the KYC Process Work?

The KYC process can be carried out both offline and online. Regardless of the method, the following documents are essential:

  • Identification proof: These documents verify your identity. Examples include an Aadhar card, passport, driver’s license, or voter ID card.
  • Address proof: This is used to verify your current address. Utility bills, rental agreements, and even some ID proofs can be used to verify your address.
  • Income proof: A few entities may require proof of income to assess your financial status. Such documents include salary slips, income tax returns, or bank statements.
  • Photographs: One or two passport-size pictures are required as well.
  • Additional documents: Depending on the entity you’re opening an account with, a few more documents, such as a PAN card or business registration documents, might be needed.
  • Self-declaration form: In most cases, you’ll need to fill out and sign a self-declaration form confirming the accuracy of your KYC information, and they’ve been submitted in compliance with applicable laws. 

The KYC process is conducted in the following order:

  1. Collection of information: The applicants first submit their personal information. After which, they are required to fill out an online KYC registration form.
  2. Uploading of evidence: Once their information is collected, the applicants have to validate it with relevant documents. These serve as evidence to prove they are who they say they are. Neokred’s ProfileX takes this a step further with its secure verification feature that implements facial recognition technology to prevent identity frauds.
  3. Verification: Once the forms and relevant documents have been uploaded, they undergo multiple checks to ensure they haven’t been tampered with. The verification process may take time, and the applicants will receive a notification from the entity if their application has been approved. 

What are the Main AML Regulations?

AML regulations in India are primarily governed by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which mandates businesses and financial institutions to implement robust measures to detect and prevent financial crimes. 

Between 2014 and 2024, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) registered over 5,200 money laundering cases, with 40 convictions and three acquittals. This indicates the threat money laundering poses to the Indian economy, which has led to the necessity of regulatory bodies enforcing AML regulations. 

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) are key regulators that have been integral towards the development of robust AML frameworks. More regulations anchored by the PLMA were implemented to address the rising number of financial crimes and safeguard the nation’s economic system:

  1. PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005: Requires reporting entities to maintain transaction records and submit those deemed suspicious to the Financial Intelligence Unit - India (FIU-IND).
  2. PML (Amendment) Act, 2009: Introduced the concept of “corresponding law enforcement agencies” where information about reporting entities could also be shared with foreign agencies.
  3. PML (Amendment) Act, 2012: Introduced the concept of politically exposed persons, expanded the scope of reporting entities to NPOs and lowered the threshold for identifying beneficial owners.
  4. PML (Amendment) Act, 2015: This was made to align Indian AML laws with international standards by introducing the concepts of “reporting financial institution” and “reporting authority.”
  5. PML (Maintenance of Records) Amendment Rules, 2023: This amendment aimed to bolster AML compliance efforts by widening the scope for reporting entities and customer due diligence requirements. It imposed stricter KYC norms for company secretaries and chartered accountants, including cryptocurrency and virtual digital asset transactions under AML norms. 

How Automation Improves KYC/AML Compliance

Automation has the power to streamline KYC and AML in the following ways:

Online Identity Verification

Businesses can automate KYC procedures and obtain customer identity data through online verification. The process begins with the user selecting their ID document type and uploading pictures. Once the KYC platform screens the documents, users are asked to send a photo of themselves holding the document to verify that they are real people. Biometric checks and facial authentications are done under automated KYCs to verify customers' identities.

For example, ProfileX makes digital identity verification easier with its top-of-the-line KYC API. The platform verifies customer identities in seconds with unparalleled accuracy and validates their information with automated document cross-checking with trusted sources.

Automated AML and Sanctions Screening

Automating AML and sanctions screening is also highly effective in reducing businesses' manual burden of conducting the verification processes themselves. Through automation, companies can build verification flows in compliance with AML/KYC regulations, maximising reliability and protecting them from financial crimes. PEP lists, sanctions lists, watchlists, and adverse media lists are a few sources that automation can use to screen customers for possible risks. 

Transaction Monitoring and Digital Wallets

KYC/AML automation facilitates real-time monitoring of customer transactions and detection of illegal or suspicious activities. Since many users also create digital wallets for online payments, automation tools can verify their identities and continuously monitor their transactions. 

Consequences of Poor AML & KYC Compliance

Here’s a brief overview of some of the consequences companies and financial institutions can face due to poor AML and KYC compliance:

Facilitating Criminal Activities Unknowingly

Poor AML and KYC policies can cause financial institutions to unknowingly facilitate illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing on behalf of criminals. This can expose the entity to risks, so robust identity verification and monitoring procedures are required.

Regulatory Fines and Penalties

Did you know that the number of penalties imposed by the RBI on financial institutions grew 88% over the last three years? What’s worse is that AML and KYC non-compliances contributed to that growth. Regulatory bodies impose strict guidelines that companies must follow to maintain AML and KYC compliance. Failure to adhere to these guidelines will result in fines, sanctions, and legal penalties. 

Reputational Damage and Loss of Customer Confidence

Breaching AML and KYC compliance erodes customer trust and confidence in the entity. Adverse publicity, media scrutiny, and loss of loyal customers are common results of such compliance breaches, which can persuade customers to switch to competitors perceived as more trustworthy. 

Exposure to Greater Financial and Operational Risks

The consequences aren’t limited to the above three; there are more. The entities in question will become more vulnerable to financial scams. They will frequently be subjected to regulatory investigations and incur higher costs for remediation efforts. Loss of business partnerships and profitability are also long-term consequences they’ll have to face. 

Best Practices for KYC/AML in Banking, Crypto, and Fintech

Since banking, cryptocurrency, and the fintech industries are more vulnerable to financial fraud, here are some of the best KYC/AML practices that can be followed to mitigate such risks:

  • Ensuring compliance with AML laws: Properly complying with AML laws and regulations will prevent businesses from incurring hefty fines and penalties for non-compliance. It will also ensure that their reputation and customer loyalty are preserved.
  • Internal controls and audits: Businesses should conduct regular audits and reviews of their KYC/AML policies to ensure there are no weaknesses or loopholes that criminals can exploit to conduct illicit activities.
  • Verified users: Fraudsters use fake IDs and various sophisticated schemes to conduct fraud. Financial institutions should ensure that only verified users can become customers, which can reduce innovative fraud attacks.
  • Enhancing user experience: Financial institutions can optimize KYC/AML process workflows based on applicant risk profiles so they don’t have to pass extra checks. This motivates the customers to complete the process without dropping off in between, thus improving the overall user experience. Neokred makes this possible as the platform’s onboarding workflows ensure reduced customer drop-offs by 24%. 

Conclusion

To sum up, KYC and AML compliance share the same goal of preventing financial crimes. However, while KYC focuses on verifying customer identities, AML aims to detect and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and other financial crimes. Understanding the key differences between KYC and AML and implementing their best practices will help you streamline and strengthen your compliance efforts. 

With Neokred’s KYC APIs, you can stay ahead of evolving regulations with constantly updated databases, real-time user identity and secure verifications, and more features that offer your customers a seamless onboarding experience. Contact us today to learn more about our KYC platform’s capabilities!

Conclusion

FAQs

Is KYC under AML?

KYC is a subset of AML requirements.

What is the relationship between KYC and AML?

AML is a broad set of measures that includes KYC, customer due diligence, risk assessment, and suspicious activity monitoring. KYC verifies a customer’s identity and is critical to the AML process.

What are the four elements of AML KYC?

The four elements of KYC and AML are Customer identification, Ongoing due diligence, Risk management, and Customer acceptance policy.

What is Know Your Customer (KYC)?

KYC refers to obtaining customers’ information, such as name, date of birth, address, etc. and verifying their identities to ensure they are who they say they are. 

What is Anti-Money Laundering (AML)?

AML refers to measures carried out by financial institutions and other entities to prevent financial crimes. It involves customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, risk assessment, and suspicious activity reporting.

What is the difference between KYC and AML?

KYC primarily focuses on verifying customers' identities, whereas AML focuses on detecting and reporting suspicious activity and learning more about customers and their sources of funds.

Verified
Build Frictionless
Customer Journeys
Get Started

Related Posts

View All
5 Mins

GDPR vs DPDPA: What Indian Businesses Need to Know

GDPR vs DPDPA: What Indian Businesses Need to Know  

Introduction

With the enforcement of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act (DPDPA) in India, businesses are facing a major shift in how they handle user data. While many are already familiar with the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) from the European Union, the Indian DPDPA brings a localized set of expectations that require careful alignment.

If your business operates online, handles user data, or targets customers in India, understanding the similarities and differences between GDPR and DPDPA is crucial to avoid non-compliance penalties and maintain user trust.

What Is GDPR and What Is DPDPA?

GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) is a comprehensive data privacy regulation that governs the use of personal data of EU citizens. Enforced since 2018, it applies to any organisation inside or outside Europe that processes EU user data.

DPDPA (Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023) is India’s data protection law designed to address the digital privacy needs of Indian citizens. While inspired by GDPR, it focuses on Indian legal, social, and operational contexts.

Key Similarities

Both regulations are built on similar privacy principles such as lawful and fair data processing, data minimization, purpose limitation, and user consent. They also emphasize the importance of transparency, giving users access to their data, and ensuring organisations implement strong data security measures.

Important Differences Between GDPR and DPDPA

Despite similarities, there are critical differences businesses must understand:

  • Scope and Applicability: GDPR applies globally to any entity handling EU citizen data, while DPDPA primarily applies to entities processing digital personal data of Indian citizens.
  • Consent: Both require clear and informed consent, but DPDPA introduces the concept of “deemed consent” allowing processing in certain legitimate contexts without explicit permission, such as for employment or public interest.
  • Age of Consent: GDPR sets the age of consent at 16 (with member states allowed to lower it to 13), whereas DPDPA fixes it at 18 across the board.
  • Regulatory Authority: GDPR is enforced by individual Data Protection Authorities (DPAs) in each EU country. DPDPA will be enforced centrally by the Data Protection Board of India.
  • Cross-Border Transfers: GDPR permits data transfers to countries with “adequate” privacy protections. DPDPA allows transfers to countries notified by the Indian government a more discretionary mechanism.
  • Penalties: GDPR can fine up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover. DPDPA fines can go up to ₹250 crore, making it one of the strictest regimes in the APAC region.
  • Data Subject Rights: GDPR grants broad rights including data portability and objection to processing. DPDPA offers rights like access, correction, erasure, and grievance redressal with some differences in implementation detail.

Why GDPR-Compliant Doesn’t Mean DPDPA-Compliant

Many businesses assume that GDPR compliance gives them automatic coverage under DPDPA. But DPDPA’s specific provisions like deemed consent, age requirements, and regional enforcement require a separate layer of localization.

Compliance with GDPR is a strong foundation, but not a full solution for Indian legal obligations.

How Blutic Helps You Navigate Both

Blutic is built to handle both GDPR and DPDPA compliance through a unified, region-aware platform. It helps businesses:

  • Show location-based cookie consent banners
  • Categorize cookies clearly with opt-in controls
  • Record and store user preferences with timestamps
  • Offer granular consent management for specific data purposes
  • Integrate with tools like Google Tag Manager, Shopify, and WordPress
  • Maintain consent logs for audit readiness

Whether you're an Indian business expanding to Europe or a global company entering India, Blutic ensures you're compliant, user-friendly, and future-proof.

India’s DPDPA reflects a maturing digital landscape, demanding accountability from businesses handling personal data. While it borrows foundational elements from GDPR, it introduces its own framework and enforcement style. Understanding these differences and acting early is the key to risk-free, trust-centric operations.

Blutic helps Indian businesses confidently navigate this evolving space by simplifying compliance without compromising user experience.

5 Mins

How Fintechs Can Reduce KYC Onboarding Drop-Off Caused by Form Fatigue

Why KYC Onboarding Still Struggles to Convert

In fintech onboarding, intent is rarely the issue. Users begin the journey willing to complete identity verification, yet a significant number never reach the end. Industry-wide, KYC and identity verification stages consistently see the highest abandonment especially when users are required to manually enter the same information multiple times across forms and document uploads. User patience hasn’t decreased. Expectations have increased.

The Cost of Form Fatigue in Fintech Onboarding

Repetitive onboarding flows introduce friction at the most sensitive stage of the user journey.

This typically shows up as:

  • Long forms asking for identity and address details  
  • Document uploads that repeat already-entered information  
  • Multiple steps validating the same data  

Each repetition adds effort. Each added step increases the likelihood of drop-off.

For businesses, this friction results in:

  • Higher acquisition costs with lower activation rates  
  • Delayed customer onboarding  
  • Increased operational effort to follow up on incomplete applications  

Form fatigue affects both conversion and efficiency.

Why This Problem Exists Across the Industry

Many onboarding systems were designed around verification completeness, not user effort minimisation.

As a result:

  • Data capture and verification operate as separate stages  
  • Document uploads don’t meaningfully reduce form length  
  • Users are asked to provide the same information in different formats  

When verification workflows are layered on top of forms instead of integrated into them, redundancy becomes visible—and frustrating.

What Efficient Onboarding Looks Like

Effective onboarding follows a simple principle:
Do not ask users to manually enter information that already exists in a verifiable form.

Instead:

  • Verified data is reused within the onboarding flow  
  • Forms are shortened wherever possible  
  • Users confirm details rather than re-enter them  

This keeps onboarding focused on validation, not repetition.

How ProfileX Supports This Approach

ProfileX, built by Neokred, supports onboarding flows where verified data is used to reduce unnecessary manual input.

ProfileX enables:

  • Real-time verification of identity and address  
  • Support for both individual (KYC) and business (KYB) onboarding  
  • Validation of company registrations, tax IDs, licenses, and regulatory documents  

The emphasis is on reducing redundant user effort while maintaining structured verification processes.

Automation Without Disrupting the User Journey

ProfileX supports automated KYC and KYB processes through configurable workflows that reduce manual intervention.

This helps:

  • Maintain onboarding continuity  
  • Limit repeated user actions  
  • Keep the experience consistent across channels  

Automation is applied to simplify the flow not to add complexity.

Fraud and Risk Signals During Onboarding

Onboarding is also a critical point for early risk detection.

ProfileX includes fraud and risk signaling using device intelligence, which:

  • Analyses device behaviour during user interaction  
  • Identifies anomalies such as emulators, bots, or tampered devices  
  • Detects multiple accounts associated with the same device  

These signals integrate into existing risk workflows and operate without interrupting genuine users.

Reducing Drop-Off Starts with Removing Repetition

Onboarding failures are rarely caused by lack of intent. They are more often caused by users being asked to repeat themselves.

By shortening forms, reusing verified data, and integrating verification directly into the flow, fintechs can reduce onboarding drop-offs without weakening compliance requirements.

What to Review in Your Onboarding Flow

If drop-offs consistently occur midway through onboarding, it’s usually a process signal.

Look for:

  • Fields users have already provided elsewhere  
  • Uploads that don’t reduce manual effort  
  • Steps that validate the same data twice  

That’s where friction starts and where improvement has the most impact.

5 Mins

Why Soundbox Devices Are Becoming Essential for Indian Merchants

Why Soundbox Devices Are Becoming Essential for Indian Merchants

India’s digital payments scale has exposed a gap that software alone cannot solve: real-time, unambiguous payment confirmation at the physical point of sale. Soundbox devices have emerged not as accessories, but as operational infrastructure for merchants handling high-frequency UPI transactions.

The Real Problem Soundboxes Solve: Payment Ambiguity at Scale

UPI works exceptionally well at the system level. The friction appears at the merchant execution layer.

In busy retail environments, merchants deal with:

  • Simultaneous customers
  • Multiple payment apps
  • Network latency or delayed app notifications
  • Human error during verification

The result is payment ambiguity situations where a customer claims success, but the merchant cannot instantly verify receipt. Soundbox devices eliminate this ambiguity by becoming a single source of truth at the counter.

Why Smartphone-Based Verification Fails in Real-World Conditions

Most merchant apps assume ideal conditions: one device, one transaction, one operator. Indian retail rarely works this way.

Operational limitations include:

  • Shared phones across staff
  • Battery drain and device downtime
  • Notification overload
  • App switching delays during peak hours

Soundboxes offload payment confirmation from smartphones to dedicated hardware, improving reliability without adding complexity.

Impact on Transaction Throughput and Queue Economics

In high-volume environments, even a 2–3 second delay per transaction compounds quickly.

Soundbox devices:

  • Remove the need for manual checks
  • Enable continuous transaction flow
  • Reduce verbal confirmation loops with customers

For merchants processing hundreds of payments daily, this translates to:

  • Shorter queues
  • Higher throughput
  • Better staff productivity

This operational efficiency directly affects revenue during peak periods.

Dispute Reduction and Operational Risk Control

UPI disputes are rarely about fraud they are about timing, visibility, and confirmation.

Soundbox devices help reduce:

  • “Paid but not received” arguments
  • Accidental double payments
  • Missed transactions during rush hours

By announcing only confirmed credits, soundboxes introduce determinism into an otherwise probabilistic verification process.

Trust Signaling in Semi-Formal Retail Environments

In many Indian retail settings, trust is built in real time.

Audio confirmation:

  • Signals transaction success to both parties
  • Reduces dependency on visual proof
  • Reinforces merchant legitimacy

This is particularly important in:

  • Cash-heavy neighborhoods
  • First-time digital payment users
  • Tier-2 and tier-3 markets

Soundboxes quietly reinforce confidence in digital payments without requiring user education.

Integration with POS, QR, and Merchant Workflows

Modern soundbox deployments are no longer standalone.

They are increasingly:

  • Linked to dynamic QR systems
  • Integrated with POS terminals
  • Synced with merchant dashboards and settlement systems

This integration ensures consistency across:

  • Payment modes
  • Transaction records
  • End-of-day reconciliation

Soundboxes are becoming part of a cohesive merchant payments stack, not an isolated device.

Uptime, Connectivity, and Hardware Dependability

In payments, reliability is not a feature — it is a baseline requirement.

Soundbox devices are designed for:

  • Continuous power availability
  • Low-bandwidth connectivity
  • Always-on operation

This makes them more dependable than consumer smartphones in retail environments, especially during long operating hours.

Soundboxes as Enablers of Merchant Digitization

Beyond confirmation, soundbox adoption has second-order effects:

  • Encourages full digital acceptance
  • Reduces cash handling
  • Creates cleaner transaction records
  • Supports future credit and analytics use cases

For small merchants, soundboxes act as a gateway device into structured digital commerce.

Strategic Importance in India’s Payment Infrastructure

India’s payment growth is not constrained by consumer adoption it is constrained by merchant-side execution.

Soundbox devices solve a uniquely Indian problem:

  • Extremely high UPI volume
  • Highly fragmented merchant base
  • Real-world retail constraints

This is why soundboxes have moved from optional add-ons to core infrastructure.

Soundbox devices are not about convenience. They are about clarity, speed, and operational certainty at the moment money changes hands.

For Indian merchants operating at scale, soundboxes are no longer a nice-to-have — they are becoming essential to running digital-first commerce reliably.

Ready to take your customer experience and product to next level with Neokred