KYC and AML Compliance: Key Differences and Best Practices

By
Tarun Nazare
23 Oct
5 Mins

If the Indian economy has taught us one thing, it’s that Know Your Customer (KYC) alone isn’t enough to prevent financial scams. Illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing are quite notorious in the banking and corporate sectors, which indicates a growing need to find a holistic way to prevent such activities.

Enter Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, the answer to combating financial crimes. While KYC effectively verifies customers' identities and filters out bad players, a recent study showed that 70% of frauds have occurred even after completing KYC processes. This is where AML strengthens the KYC process and deters criminals even further. 

While both concepts are similar in objective, they have underlying differences. Let’s explore how KYC differs from AML and some of their best practices in fintech!

What is Know Your Customer (KYC)?

Know Your Customer refers to the mandatory process of verifying customers' identities. Organisations and financial institutions collect information about their customers in compliance with legal requirements for identity verification and risk assessment. As a critical component of anti-money laundering, KYC is primarily used to prevent financial crimes like fraud, identity theft, etc.

What is Anti-Money Laundering (AML)?

Anti-money laundering refers to the regulations and procedures organisations and financial institutions follow to detect and prevent financial crimes such as money laundering and terrorism. It involves performing extensive due diligence on customers, monitoring their transactions for suspicious activities, and reporting them if a crime is suspected. AML compliance is usually carried out to prevent illegal activities such as tax evasion, political corruption, money laundering, terrorist financing, etc. 

What is the Difference Between KYC and AML?

Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering are legal requirements for businesses to protect against financial crimes. However, they differ in the following ways:

Know Your Customer Anti-Money Laundering
Purpose To verify customer identities and monitor financial behaviour. To detect and prevent money laundering or terrorist financing activities.
Process Involves collecting and verifying customer information such as their name, address, date of birth, documents, etc. Involves risk assessment, reporting, and legal controls over suspicious activities and transactions.
Risk Management Identifying and assessing risks. Mitigating risks associated with money laundering.
Approach Comprehensive, continuous, and follows a risk-based approach. Proactively measures all AML risks and implements holistic policies to reduce them.

Where and When are KYC and AML Required?

To prevent financial crimes, KYC and AML are required in various industries and circumstances. Following both are mandatory for all regulated entities, some of which include:

  • Financial institutions: Before onboarding new customers, assess risks and detect suspicious activity. 
  • Payment service providers: KYC and AML are done before opening digital wallets or activating digital transactions.
  • Cryptocurrency exchanges: Crypto and DeFi platforms implement KYC and AML before allowing users to trade or convert digital assets to prevent money laundering via cryptocurrencies.
  • Gambling and casinos: They are done upon player registration, during large transactions, and withdrawal of funds. 
  • Corporate entities: Large corporations and venture capital firms conduct KYC and AML checks during mergers, acquisitions, or major investments to ensure legitimacy and prevent illicit financial activities. 

What Does the AML Screening Process Look Like?

Organisations and financial institutions typically perform AML screening. They check potential customers against public lists to verify whether they are high-risk individuals or are involved with entities engaging in money laundering or terrorist financing. In other words, they analyse customer information and transactions to verify their legitimacy and identify suspicious behaviours. 

While conducting an AML screening process, you should be on the lookout for a few red flags like usual transactions, use of anonymous entities, unexplained wealth increase, large cash transactions, etc.

There are a few types of screening processes your business can conduct:

  • Sanctions screening: These lists are maintained by government agencies and contain information about individuals or entities deemed national security threats. These are individuals who are prohibited from certain financial dealings.
  • Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) Checks: Under this process, individuals who hold high-profile positions in government or politics may be more likely to engage in financial crimes such as bribery or corruption, making them high-risk individuals.
  • Adverse media sources: These sources include negative news stories that may be associated with the customer being verified. This check ensures that the individual does not portray the company negatively. 
  • Watchlist Screening: Companies check a customer’s information against specific databases containing data about known or suspected criminals. Watchlists are similar to sanction lists but are constantly updated and even employ real-time screening for adequate due diligence.

How does the KYC Process Work?

The KYC process can be carried out both offline and online. Regardless of the method, the following documents are essential:

  • Identification proof: These documents verify your identity. Examples include an Aadhar card, passport, driver’s license, or voter ID card.
  • Address proof: This is used to verify your current address. Utility bills, rental agreements, and even some ID proofs can be used to verify your address.
  • Income proof: A few entities may require proof of income to assess your financial status. Such documents include salary slips, income tax returns, or bank statements.
  • Photographs: One or two passport-size pictures are required as well.
  • Additional documents: Depending on the entity you’re opening an account with, a few more documents, such as a PAN card or business registration documents, might be needed.
  • Self-declaration form: In most cases, you’ll need to fill out and sign a self-declaration form confirming the accuracy of your KYC information, and they’ve been submitted in compliance with applicable laws. 

The KYC process is conducted in the following order:

  1. Collection of information: The applicants first submit their personal information. After which, they are required to fill out an online KYC registration form.
  2. Uploading of evidence: Once their information is collected, the applicants have to validate it with relevant documents. These serve as evidence to prove they are who they say they are. Neokred’s ProfileX takes this a step further with its secure verification feature that implements facial recognition technology to prevent identity frauds.
  3. Verification: Once the forms and relevant documents have been uploaded, they undergo multiple checks to ensure they haven’t been tampered with. The verification process may take time, and the applicants will receive a notification from the entity if their application has been approved. 

What are the Main AML Regulations?

AML regulations in India are primarily governed by the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), which mandates businesses and financial institutions to implement robust measures to detect and prevent financial crimes. 

Between 2014 and 2024, the Enforcement Directorate (ED) registered over 5,200 money laundering cases, with 40 convictions and three acquittals. This indicates the threat money laundering poses to the Indian economy, which has led to the necessity of regulatory bodies enforcing AML regulations. 

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), and Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) are key regulators that have been integral towards the development of robust AML frameworks. More regulations anchored by the PLMA were implemented to address the rising number of financial crimes and safeguard the nation’s economic system:

  1. PML (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005: Requires reporting entities to maintain transaction records and submit those deemed suspicious to the Financial Intelligence Unit - India (FIU-IND).
  2. PML (Amendment) Act, 2009: Introduced the concept of “corresponding law enforcement agencies” where information about reporting entities could also be shared with foreign agencies.
  3. PML (Amendment) Act, 2012: Introduced the concept of politically exposed persons, expanded the scope of reporting entities to NPOs and lowered the threshold for identifying beneficial owners.
  4. PML (Amendment) Act, 2015: This was made to align Indian AML laws with international standards by introducing the concepts of “reporting financial institution” and “reporting authority.”
  5. PML (Maintenance of Records) Amendment Rules, 2023: This amendment aimed to bolster AML compliance efforts by widening the scope for reporting entities and customer due diligence requirements. It imposed stricter KYC norms for company secretaries and chartered accountants, including cryptocurrency and virtual digital asset transactions under AML norms. 

How Automation Improves KYC/AML Compliance

Automation has the power to streamline KYC and AML in the following ways:

Online Identity Verification

Businesses can automate KYC procedures and obtain customer identity data through online verification. The process begins with the user selecting their ID document type and uploading pictures. Once the KYC platform screens the documents, users are asked to send a photo of themselves holding the document to verify that they are real people. Biometric checks and facial authentications are done under automated KYCs to verify customers' identities.

For example, ProfileX makes digital identity verification easier with its top-of-the-line KYC API. The platform verifies customer identities in seconds with unparalleled accuracy and validates their information with automated document cross-checking with trusted sources.

Automated AML and Sanctions Screening

Automating AML and sanctions screening is also highly effective in reducing businesses' manual burden of conducting the verification processes themselves. Through automation, companies can build verification flows in compliance with AML/KYC regulations, maximising reliability and protecting them from financial crimes. PEP lists, sanctions lists, watchlists, and adverse media lists are a few sources that automation can use to screen customers for possible risks. 

Transaction Monitoring and Digital Wallets

KYC/AML automation facilitates real-time monitoring of customer transactions and detection of illegal or suspicious activities. Since many users also create digital wallets for online payments, automation tools can verify their identities and continuously monitor their transactions. 

Consequences of Poor AML & KYC Compliance

Here’s a brief overview of some of the consequences companies and financial institutions can face due to poor AML and KYC compliance:

Facilitating Criminal Activities Unknowingly

Poor AML and KYC policies can cause financial institutions to unknowingly facilitate illegal activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing on behalf of criminals. This can expose the entity to risks, so robust identity verification and monitoring procedures are required.

Regulatory Fines and Penalties

Did you know that the number of penalties imposed by the RBI on financial institutions grew 88% over the last three years? What’s worse is that AML and KYC non-compliances contributed to that growth. Regulatory bodies impose strict guidelines that companies must follow to maintain AML and KYC compliance. Failure to adhere to these guidelines will result in fines, sanctions, and legal penalties. 

Reputational Damage and Loss of Customer Confidence

Breaching AML and KYC compliance erodes customer trust and confidence in the entity. Adverse publicity, media scrutiny, and loss of loyal customers are common results of such compliance breaches, which can persuade customers to switch to competitors perceived as more trustworthy. 

Exposure to Greater Financial and Operational Risks

The consequences aren’t limited to the above three; there are more. The entities in question will become more vulnerable to financial scams. They will frequently be subjected to regulatory investigations and incur higher costs for remediation efforts. Loss of business partnerships and profitability are also long-term consequences they’ll have to face. 

Best Practices for KYC/AML in Banking, Crypto, and Fintech

Since banking, cryptocurrency, and the fintech industries are more vulnerable to financial fraud, here are some of the best KYC/AML practices that can be followed to mitigate such risks:

  • Ensuring compliance with AML laws: Properly complying with AML laws and regulations will prevent businesses from incurring hefty fines and penalties for non-compliance. It will also ensure that their reputation and customer loyalty are preserved.
  • Internal controls and audits: Businesses should conduct regular audits and reviews of their KYC/AML policies to ensure there are no weaknesses or loopholes that criminals can exploit to conduct illicit activities.
  • Verified users: Fraudsters use fake IDs and various sophisticated schemes to conduct fraud. Financial institutions should ensure that only verified users can become customers, which can reduce innovative fraud attacks.
  • Enhancing user experience: Financial institutions can optimize KYC/AML process workflows based on applicant risk profiles so they don’t have to pass extra checks. This motivates the customers to complete the process without dropping off in between, thus improving the overall user experience. Neokred makes this possible as the platform’s onboarding workflows ensure reduced customer drop-offs by 24%. 

Conclusion

To sum up, KYC and AML compliance share the same goal of preventing financial crimes. However, while KYC focuses on verifying customer identities, AML aims to detect and prevent illegal activities such as money laundering and other financial crimes. Understanding the key differences between KYC and AML and implementing their best practices will help you streamline and strengthen your compliance efforts. 

With Neokred’s KYC APIs, you can stay ahead of evolving regulations with constantly updated databases, real-time user identity and secure verifications, and more features that offer your customers a seamless onboarding experience. Contact us today to learn more about our KYC platform’s capabilities!

Conclusion

FAQs

Is KYC under AML?

KYC is a subset of AML requirements.

What is the relationship between KYC and AML?

AML is a broad set of measures that includes KYC, customer due diligence, risk assessment, and suspicious activity monitoring. KYC verifies a customer’s identity and is critical to the AML process.

What are the four elements of AML KYC?

The four elements of KYC and AML are Customer identification, Ongoing due diligence, Risk management, and Customer acceptance policy.

What is Know Your Customer (KYC)?

KYC refers to obtaining customers’ information, such as name, date of birth, address, etc. and verifying their identities to ensure they are who they say they are. 

What is Anti-Money Laundering (AML)?

AML refers to measures carried out by financial institutions and other entities to prevent financial crimes. It involves customer due diligence, ongoing monitoring, risk assessment, and suspicious activity reporting.

What is the difference between KYC and AML?

KYC primarily focuses on verifying customers' identities, whereas AML focuses on detecting and reporting suspicious activity and learning more about customers and their sources of funds.

Verified
Build Frictionless
Customer Journeys
Get Started

Related Posts

View All
5 Mins

When Financial Identity Breaks, Wealth Becomes Invisible

Invisible wealth in India emerges when financial identities fragment across banks, insurers, employers, and pension systems over time. This blog explores how static KYC, siloed records, outdated nominee data, and long time horizons cause legitimate financial relationships to decay into dormancy. Rather than treating unclaimed money as isolated financial lapses, the article reframes the issue as a systemic identity and data infrastructure challenge, highlighting why continuity, interoperability, and persistent identity resolution are critical to ensuring wealth remains visible and reachable.

When Financial Identity Breaks, Wealth Becomes Invisible

Unclaimed funds in India are often discussed in terms of money crores lying idle in banks, insurance companies, and government funds. But at a deeper level, these funds exist because financial identities break apart over time.

What starts as a valid, verified customer relationship slowly becomes unrecognisable as people change jobs, cities, names, contact details, and life circumstances. When systems fail to reconnect these identities, money turns into invisible wealth.

 

Financial Identity Is Not a Single Record

Most financial systems treat identity as a point-in-time event:

  • KYC at account opening
  • Nominee details at purchase
  • Static records stored indefinitely

In reality, identity is dynamic. Over a lifetime, individuals accumulate multiple financial relationships that are never fully reconciled.

This gap explains why:

  • Bank deposits become dormant
  • Insurance policies go unclaimed
  • PF and pension accounts are forgotten
  • Dividends fail to reach shareholders

 

Siloed Systems Multiply Identity Gaps

Each financial institution operates its own data stack:

  • Banks
  • Insurance companies
  • Employers
  • Pension administrators
  • Capital market intermediaries

Even though all are regulated by authorities such as the Reserve Bank of India and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India, identity data is not interoperable.

As a result:

  • The same person exists as multiple records
  • Updates in one system never propagate
  • Ownership continuity silently erodes

 

When Time Breaks Identity

Unclaimed funds rarely arise overnight. They are the outcome of long time horizons.

Over 10–30 years, people experience:

  • Migration and address changes
  • Job switches and employer exits
  • Name changes after marriage
  • Loss of documentation
  • Death without consolidated records

Legacy identity systems were not designed to survive decades of change.

 

Nominees Don’t Solve Discovery

Nominee frameworks exist but discovery remains weak:

  • Nominees may be unaware of policies
  • Families may not know where assets exist
  • Documentation may be incomplete

Without discoverability, nomination alone cannot prevent funds from becoming unclaimed.

 

Invisible Wealth Is a Trust Problem

When families discover unclaimed funds late or never trust erodes:

  • Individuals lose faith in institutions
  • Institutions face operational and reputational burden
  • Recovery becomes manual and emotionally costly

Unclaimed funds are therefore not just an operational issue they are a trust continuity failure.

 

The Infrastructure Shift Needed

Preventing invisible wealth requires:

  • Persistent identity resolution
  • Relationship mapping across time
  • Secure, privacy-aware data reconciliation
  • Recognition of individuals beyond onboarding

Identity must be treated as infrastructure, not paperwork.

5 Mins

Unclaimed Insurance Money in India: How Forgotten Policies Leave Crores Unclaimed

Unclaimed insurance money in India includes life insurance maturity proceeds, survival benefits, and death claims that remain unpaid because policyholders or beneficiaries do not come forward. This blog explains how IRDAI regulates unclaimed insurance, why policies are often forgotten, and how individuals or legal heirs can check for and recover unclaimed amounts. It also highlights that unclaimed insurance is a broader challenge of identity continuity, nominee awareness, and long-term record management.

Unclaimed Insurance Money in India: How Forgotten Policies Leave Crores Unclaimed

 

Insurance is designed to provide financial protection at critical moments yet a surprising amount of insurance money in India remains unclaimed. These unclaimed amounts include life insurance maturity proceeds, survival benefits, and even death claims that were never settled because beneficiaries did not come forward or were unaware of the policy’s existence.

To protect policyholders and beneficiaries, Indian insurance regulations require insurers to identify, disclose, and safeguard unclaimed insurance money ensuring it remains fully claimable by rightful owners or legal heirs at any time.

 

What Is Unclaimed Insurance Money?

Unclaimed insurance money refers to policy proceeds that have become due but remain unpaid because the insurer could not successfully disburse them to the policyholder or nominee.

This typically includes:

  • Life insurance maturity proceeds
  • Survival benefits under endowment policies
  • Death claims not claimed by nominees or legal heirs
  • Refunds or residual balances under lapsed or discontinued policies

Unclaimed insurance money does not lapse or get forfeited it remains payable indefinitely.

 

Who Regulates Unclaimed Insurance Money in India?

All insurance companies in India operate under the oversight of the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI).

IRDAI mandates insurers to:

  • Periodically identify unclaimed and unpaid amounts
  • Attempt to trace policyholders or nominees
  • Disclose unclaimed amounts publicly
  • Maintain accurate policy and nominee records

These requirements exist to ensure transparency and consumer protection.

 

Types of Insurance Money That Go Unclaimed

1. Unclaimed Life Insurance Maturity Proceeds

When a policy reaches maturity, the insurer is required to pay the maturity amount. If the policyholder:

  • Has changed address or contact details
  • Is unaware of the maturity
  • Has multiple legacy policies

the proceeds may remain unpaid and become unclaimed.

 

2. Unclaimed Death Claims

Death claims often go unclaimed when:

  • Nominees are unaware of the policy
  • Nominee details are missing or outdated
  • Legal heirs lack documentation
  • Policies were purchased decades earlier

These are among the most sensitive and complex unclaimed insurance cases.

 

3. Unclaimed Survival Benefits

In policies with periodic payouts, survival benefits may remain unpaid if policyholders fail to respond to insurer communications or update bank details.

 

Why Do Insurance Policies Go Unclaimed?

Unlike bank accounts, insurance policies are often long-term and low-touch, making them easier to forget.

Common reasons include:

  • Policyholders purchasing multiple policies over time
  • Change in address, phone number, or email
  • Lack of nominee awareness
  • Death of the policyholder without consolidated records
  • Poor documentation passed on to family members

In many cases, families discover policies only years later.

 

How Insurers Identify and Handle Unclaimed Amounts

As per IRDAI guidelines, insurers must:

  • Categorize unpaid amounts based on duration
  • Make reasonable efforts to contact policyholders or nominees
  • Publish unclaimed amount details on their websites
  • Maintain internal systems to track unpaid claims

These disclosures are intended to help beneficiaries discover forgotten policies.

 

How to Check for Unclaimed Insurance Money

Individuals or legal heirs can:

  • Search insurer websites for unclaimed amount disclosures
  • Contact insurance companies directly with basic identity details
  • Review old documents, emails, or bank statements for premium payments
  • Check policies issued under previous employers or group schemes

Unlike banking, insurance discovery is often manual and fragmented.

 

How to Claim Unclaimed Insurance Money

The claim process generally involves:

Step 1: Establish Policy Existence

Provide:

  • Policy number (if available)
  • Policyholder details
  • Supporting evidence such as premium receipts

Step 2: Identity and Relationship Verification

Insurers require:

  • Identity proof of claimant
  • Proof of relationship (for nominees or heirs)
  • Death certificate (in case of death claims)

Step 3: Claim Settlement

Once verified:

  • Insurer releases the payable amount
  • Interest may be added as per policy terms and regulatory norms

There is no expiry period for valid claims.

 

Claiming Insurance Money as a Legal Heir

If no nominee is registered, legal heirs may need:

  • Legal heir certificate or succession certificate
  • Indemnity bonds (in certain cases)
  • Additional documentation for verification

Insurers follow strict due diligence to prevent wrongful claims.

 

Why Unclaimed Insurance Money Is Also a Data Problem

Unclaimed insurance funds highlight deeper systemic gaps:

  • Fragmented identity data across insurers
  • Outdated nominee and contact records
  • Long policy tenures without periodic updates
  • Poor linkage between identity, family, and financial records

Preventing unclaimed insurance is as much about data continuity as it is about claims processing.

 

The Role of Better Identity and Record Continuity

Regulators increasingly emphasize:

  • Accurate customer identification
  • Periodic KYC updates
  • Clear nominee records
  • Traceability across time

Strong digital identity infrastructure helps ensure that insurance benefits reach the right person at the right time.

5 Mins

The Hidden Identity Problems in Unclaimed Funds in India

Unclaimed funds in India across banks, insurers, capital markets, and retirement systems are often seen as isolated financial lapses. This blog argues that they are instead a symptom of deeper identity and data infrastructure gaps. It explores how fragmented identity records, outdated nominee data, siloed institutions, and long time horizons cause financial relationships to decay into dormancy. By reframing unclaimed funds as an identity continuity challenge, the blog highlights why compliance alone is insufficient and why stronger, interoperable identity infrastructure is critical to preventing unclaimed wealth.

The Hidden Identity Problems in Unclaimed Funds in India


Unclaimed funds in India whether in bank deposits, insurance policies, dividends, or retirement accounts are often treated as isolated financial lapses. In reality, they represent a systemic failure of identity continuity and data infrastructure.

These funds are not unclaimed because they are unknown. They are unclaimed because systems fail to reliably connect people, identities, and financial relationships over time.

 

Unclaimed Funds Are a Symptom, Not the Root Problem

Regulators have established clear custodial mechanisms for unclaimed funds through institutions such as the Reserve Bank of India, the Investor Education and Protection Fund, and the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India.

Yet, despite regulatory safeguards, unclaimed balances continue to grow. This indicates that the issue is structural, not procedural.

At its core, unclaimed funds emerge when:

  • Identity records fragment
  • Ownership data becomes outdated
  • Systems cannot reconcile past and present identities

 

Fragmented Identity Across Financial Institutions

Most individuals interact with multiple financial entities over their lifetime:

  • Banks
  • Insurance companies
  • Employers
  • Pension administrators
  • Capital market intermediaries

Each institution maintains its own identity records often with no persistent linkage across time or across institutions.

As a result:

  • A person becomes multiple identities in parallel systems
  • Updates made in one institution are invisible to others
  • Financial relationships decay silently into dormancy

 

Time Is the Biggest Enemy of Identity Systems

Unclaimed funds rarely arise quickly. They accumulate over years or decades.

Common triggers include:

  • Change in address, phone number, or email
  • Name changes due to marriage
  • Job changes and employer transitions
  • Migration across cities or countries
  • Death without consolidated financial records

Legacy systems were never designed to maintain identity fidelity across long time horizons and unclaimed funds are the outcome.

 

Nominee Data: The Weakest Link

Nomination frameworks exist across banks, insurers, and pension systems, but nominee data is often:

  • Missing
  • Outdated
  • Inconsistent across institutions
  • Poorly communicated to families

When the primary account holder is no longer reachable, systems struggle to transition ownership smoothly causing funds to drift into custodial pools.

 

Data Silos Create Invisible Wealth

Each unclaimed fund pool whether under RBI, IEPF, or insurers operates independently.

This means:

  • No unified view of an individual’s financial footprint
  • No cross-institution discovery mechanism
  • No automatic reconciliation of ownership across asset classes

For families, this creates a paradox: wealth exists, but visibility does not.

 

Why Compliance Alone Cannot Solve This

Regulatory compliance ensures:

  • Funds are protected
  • Claims are honoured
  • Disclosure exists

But compliance does not ensure:

  • Identity continuity
  • Proactive discovery
  • Cross-system reconciliation

Unclaimed funds are therefore not a compliance failure they are an infrastructure gap.

 

The Role of Digital Public Infrastructure

India’s push toward digital public infrastructure has shown that identity-linked systems reduce friction and increase accountability.

Effective infrastructure for preventing unclaimed funds must enable:

  • Persistent identity resolution
  • Entity and relationship mapping
  • Data consistency across institutions
  • Secure, privacy-aware reconciliation

This does not require centralization of data but interoperability of identity signals.

 

Why Institutions Need Better Identity Resolution

For banks, insurers, and financial platforms, unclaimed funds introduce:

  • Long-term reconciliation liabilities
  • Fraud risk in dormant accounts
  • Operational and compliance overhead
  • Poor customer and beneficiary experience

Stronger identity and data infrastructure reduces:

  • Dormancy
  • Ownership ambiguity
  • Manual recovery processes

 

Unclaimed Funds as a Trust Signal

At a societal level, unclaimed funds erode trust:

  • Individuals lose confidence in institutions
  • Families struggle during financial distress
  • Institutions carry reputational and operational burden

Solving unclaimed funds is therefore not just about recovery it is about trust continuity.

 

The Path Forward: From Custody to Continuity

Preventing future unclaimed funds requires a shift in thinking:

  • From static KYC to continuous identity recognition
  • From siloed records to linked relationships
  • From reactive claims to proactive discovery

Identity, when treated as infrastructure rather than a one-time check, becomes the strongest defence against unclaimed wealth.

Ready to take your customer experience and product to next level with Neokred